Not sleeping for 8 hours a night? Good for you!

I found this to be a very interesting article. It turns out that my stressing myself about not ever getting 8 hours of sleep is probably doing more harm, than just staying up and doing what I want, does….

Original Article: Sleep Deprivation: The Great American Myth

Robin Lloyd
Special to LiveScience
LiveScience.com
Thu Mar 23, 12:00 PM ET

People who get only 6 to 7 hours a night have a lower death rate than those who get 8 hours of sleep. —From a six-year study of more than a million adults

Many Americans are sleep-deprived zombies, and a quarter of us now use some form of sleeping pill or aid at night.

Wake up, says psychiatry professor Daniel Kripke of the University of California, San Diego. The pill-taking is real but the refrain that Americans are sleep deprived originates largely from people funded by the drug industry or with financial interests in sleep research clinics.

“They think that scaring people about sleep increases their income,” Kripke told LiveScience.

Thanks to the marketing of less addictive drugs directly to consumers, sleeping pills have become a hot commodity, especially in the past five years. People worldwide spent $2 billion on the most popular sleeping pill, Ambien (zolpidem), in 2004, according to the BioMarket, a biotech research company.

Earlier this month, it was reported that some Ambien users are susceptible to amnesia and walking in their sleep. Some even ate in the middle of the night without realizing it.

Global sales for all sleeping pills, called hypnotics, will top $5 billion in the next several years.

The number of adults aged 20-44 using sleeping pills doubled from 2000 to 2004, according to Medco Health Solutions, a managed care company. Sleep problems are commonly reported in the elderly, but the increase in spending on sleeping pills was highest in this period for 10-19 year olds, possibly due to an association with medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Sleep on this

Still, more sleep is no guarantee for overall health, and more sleeping pills might not bring on either.

A six-year study Kripke headed up of more than a million adults ages 30 to 102 showed that people who get only 6 to 7 hours a night have a lower death rate than those who get 8 hours of sleep. The risk from taking sleeping pills 30 times or more a month was not much less than the risk of smoking a pack of cigarettes a day, he says.

Those who took sleeping pills nightly had a greater risk of death than those who took them occasionally, but the latter risk was still 10 to 15 percent higher than it was among people who never took sleeping pills. Sleeping pills appear unsafe in any amount, Kripke writes in his online book, “The Dark Side of Sleeping Pills.”

“There is really no evidence that the average 8-hour sleeper functions better than the average 6- or 7-hour sleeper,” Kripke says, on the basis of his ongoing psychiatric practice with patients along with research, including the large study of a million adults (called the Cancer Prevention Study II).

And he suspects that people who sleep less than average make more money and are more successful.

The Cancer Prevention Study II even showed that people with serious insomnia or who only get 3.5 hours of sleep per night, live longer than people who get more than 7.5 hours.

And there are questions about the effectiveness of sleeping pills. A study by researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School found that a change in sleep habits and attitudes was more effective in treating chronic insomnia, over the short- and long-term, than sleeping pills (specifically Ambien).

Night of the living dead

Until 15 years ago, sleeping pills were mainly addictive barbiturates (such as Seconal, Halcion, Qualude) and sedatives called benzodiazepines (Valium and Dalmane). For this reason, they were less popular and less prescribed. That changed in the early 1990s when Ambien, which is less addictive, came on the market. It acts on the same neural receptors as a benzodiazepine, but is safer. It is the only hypnotic drug Kripke recommends and then, only for fewer than four weeks. Other new hypnotic drugs are safe but ineffective, he says.

Most sleeping pills are recommended for short-term use, but lots of people take them frequently and become dependent upon them to fall asleep. Most sleeping pills, especially when taken over long periods of time, stay in the bloodstream, giving a hangover the next day and beyond, impairing memory and performance on the job and at home.

A time-release version of Ambien (Ambien CR) bound for the market and designed to prevent waking after 4 hours when the drug normally would wear off, along with one of the newest pills on the market, Lunesta, or eszopiclone, (designed for longer-term use) might be even more harmful in this way, Kripke says.

Hypnotic drugs have dangerous side effects, Kripke says. For one, they reduce fear of risky behavior, such as driving fast. Ironically, that could result in the inability to see that the sleeping pills are doing more harm than good over time.

A recent study published in the British Medical Journal showed that the risks of taking sleeping pills (benzodiazepines and other sedatives, in this case) outweighed the benefits among people over 60 in a series of studies carried out between 1966 and 2003. The pills helped people fall asleep and they slept more, but they were twice as likely to slip and fall or crash a car due to dizziness from the pills than they were to get a better night’s sleep.

Even the safest hypnotic drugs have strange side effects, as the alleged Ambien sleepwalkers showed.

And one over-the-counter approach, the hormone melatonin, was found by scientists at the University of Alberta, Canada, to be ineffective in treating jet lag and sleep trouble associated with medical problems. Studies also show it is associated with skin blanching in frogs, gonadal atrophy in small animals, and obesity in some mammals.

Are you sleeping?

The real number of Americans with sleep problems is unclear because the same figure—70 million—appears on National Institutes of Health documents from 2006 and from 1994. This catch-all category reportedly includes insomnia, jetlag, sleepwalking, bed wetting, night terrors, restless legs syndrome, narcolepsy and disordered breathing during sleep (called apnea).

The National Sleep Foundation, the source of many sleep surveys and statistics, has financial and institutional ties to sleeping pill manufacturers, according to the Sacramento Bee newspaper.

Sleep problems could be increasing, Kripke says, but there is no evidence for this. If they are increasing, it could be a result of less exposure to daylight (due to cable TV, the Internet, indoor gyms) and increasing obesity, which causes apnea. But he still recommends against taking sleeping pills in nearly all cases and in favor of improved sleep habits.

“Sleeping pills usually do more harm than good,” he says.

Some Serious Shut-eye
Improved sleep behavior and attitudes do more good than sleeping pills for the treatment of insomnia, experts at a recent National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference agreed, says Daniel Kripke of the University of California, San Diego. The changes he recommends:

  • Do not take sleeping pills. This includes over-the-counter pills and melatonin.
  • Don’t go to bed until you’re sleepy. If you have trouble sleeping, try going to bed later or getting up earlier.
  • Get up at the same time every morning, even after a bad night’s sleep. The next night, you’ll be sleepy at bedtime.
  • If you wake up in the middle of the night and can’t fall back to sleep, get out of bed and return only when you are sleepy.
  • Avoid worrying, watching TV, reading scary books, and doing other things in bed besides sleeping and sex. If you worry, read thrillers or watch TV, do that in a chair that’s not in the bedroom.
  • Do not drink or eat anything caffeinated within six hours of bedtime.
  • Avoid alcohol. It’s relaxing at first but can lead to insomnia when it clears your system.
  • Spend time outdoors. People exposed to daylight or bright light therapy sleep better.

Cool stuff to look at on Google Satelite view

Have you ever explored the artic regions?

There’s some incredible stuff to see up there in satellite view, like icebergs the size of SW PA breaking off and flowing down stream…
http://maps.google.com/?ll=80.319658,-86.594238&spn=0.282656,2.287903&t=k

I had been looking at Greenland then I became fascinated with this huge river up in Russia

http://maps.google.com/?ll=80.319658,-86.594238&spn=0.282656,2.287903&t=k

This thing is absolute HUGE and look at the pockmarked land structure around that bay… it is just wild
http://maps.google.com/?t=k&ll=70.768146,78.308487&spn=0.13842,0.571976&t=k

And that river flows all the way back to/from this huge lake thousands of miles away – which has a really weird streak across it. http://maps.google.com/?t=k&ll=53.13359,108.676758&spn=2.017007,4.575806&t=k

It must be something on the satellite’s lens… You can see it’s fabric….
http://maps.google.com/?t=k&ll=53.91814,108.683195&spn=0.02674,0.043516

Even so, I am considering submitting a story to Weekly World News about how the Russians have a massive program to create a band-aid to patch the hole in the ozone… I think it would fly don’t you?

It’s just a neat world…

I’ve nothing very profound to say right now other than that it is really neat that I can sit here at my desk working on documentation (OK and blogging) while a little window shows a NASA control room live as the Mars Orbitor is inserted into the atmosphere of a nearby planet…

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/main/index.html 

Mars-Bound Spacecraft Readies Itself for Orbit Insertion Today
 

After a seven-month journey, NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter is going through maneuvers to place itself into orbit around Mars today. Coverage of the complex orbit insertion maneuver starts at 3:30 p.m. on NASA TV and the Web . Spacecraft milestones for the event can be followed on the right. The spacecraft is the most technologically advanced ever sent to Mars.
Expected time of events (in Eastern)

4:07 p.m.:  Turn to burn attitude 
4:24 p.m.:  Orbit insertion burn begins 
4:46 p.m.:  Behind Mars / expected loss of signal 
4:51 p.m.:  Orbit insertion burn ends 
5:16 p.m.:  Re-emerges from behind Mars 
5:16 p.m.:  Re-acquisition of signal 
5:30 p.m.: Health and status report 

The live link…
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html

 I find that kind of nifty…

Bill Amend “channeling” Bill Watterson: The FoxTrot/Calvin and Hobbes Conspiracy

or Speaking of Bill Amend

OK… While I don’t much believe in “channeling” and technically speaking Bill Watterson isn’t dead even if Chagrin Falls is fairly close to it… this is really starting to freak me out!

 I asked Bill about this back in last November and he denies (oops, typed Denise there) any conspiracy on the matter but something is going on…

I first noticed this back on November 28th:

Bill posted: Click images for a better view….

Jason plays guess the number

Meanwhile 11 years earlier – to the day – the other Bill had posted:

 Calvin plays guess the number

But this week I read on Sunday:

 Calvin needs Money

 

And  11 years and a day later Bill puts this up?

Jason Needs Money

Conspiracy? 

A desperate cartoonist’s cry for help? 

Subject matter for the next episode of Sci Fi’s “In Search of…”?

You decide….

3d Dragon illusion

I sent these links to Bill Amend of FoxTrot fame (who is a really nice guy btw):

http://www.grand-illusions.com/dragon.htm

He’s made one and I’ve made one too.  I’ll post some video sometime soon to show you how mine works.

Here’s the example from the main site:

http://www.grand-illusions.com/videos/dragon%20illusion.wmv

 

And here’s what Bill had to say… 

>Works great.

>My engineer brother-in-law had the same idea as you and says he’s going to
>print one out on his office’s giant color plotter and make a huge one.

>Bill Amend

>> From: Brian Layman
>> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:52 -0500
>> To: Bill Amend

>> Subject: RE: HEY!!!!!
>>
>> Hey – how’d your cut and fold 3-d dragon turn out?
>>
>> Mine turned out fairly well, and the illusion works well too.  I had to
>> put an extra layer of paper behind some spots to prevent light from
>> shining through.  It worked better after that, but 4″ tall is too little
>> to get noticed. 
>>
>> I’m gonna redo it on an A3 page (11.7×16.5″) and see how it turns out…
>> A 1ft tall dragon should be MUCH more impressive…
>>
>> Cheers!

Turducken

Weird Words: Turducken

 ——————————————————————-

A culinary construction. Many of us have heard of this gastronomic excess, which in the USA is associated with Thanksgiving and to a lesser extent with July 4. A chicken is stuffed inside a duck inside a turkey – the inner two deboned first and themselves stuffed with such delights as sausage, cornbread, or oyster. A culinary chimera, it might be thought to stand on the same level of gustatory invention as the Glaswegian deep-fried Mars bar, though those who have tried it say it’s quite tasty. Some chefs draw away in horror from it, citing the excessive amounts of skin and fat and the high risk of bacterial problems because it is so hard to ensure that all three birds are properly cooked through. If this creation were not enough, a news article from 1997 said that a store in Louisiana was experimenting with a “pigturducken”, though nothing has been heard of it since. And a rumour has reached me via the Internet that South Africans have gone one better, producing an osturducken, in which the whole concoction is stuffed inside an ostrich. However, this may possibly be an urban legend, because the only reports come from somebody who has heard of it from somebody else.